📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / A.Savin
Crime
Bombay HC cancels bail for Sachin Waze in Antilia bomb, Mansukh Hiran murder case
✍️ The Times of India
🗓 06 Nov 2026, 06:48 AM
👁 13
The Bombay High Court has cancelled the bail granted to Sachin Waze, who is accused in the Antilia bomb scare and the murder of Mansukh Hiran.
The Bombay High Court has issued a significant judicial order by cancelling the bail previously granted to Sachin Waze. Waze is a key accused in two high-profile criminal cases: the bomb scare incident at the Antilia residence and the murder of Mansukh Hiran.
The court's decision effectively reverses the earlier relief given to the accused, meaning he will likely face continued custody or stricter conditions as per the lower court's original judgment. This move underscores the judiciary's scrutiny of the severity of the charges against him.
Sachin Waze has been at the center of legal proceedings for some time, with the Antilia case drawing national attention due to the high-profile nature of the location. The Mansukh Hiran murder case adds another layer of serious criminal liability to his profile.
The cancellation of bail is a standard legal remedy when higher courts review lower court decisions and find that the accused poses a risk or that the bail conditions were not met appropriately. No further details on the specific reasoning of the bench were provided in the initial report.
The court's decision effectively reverses the earlier relief given to the accused, meaning he will likely face continued custody or stricter conditions as per the lower court's original judgment. This move underscores the judiciary's scrutiny of the severity of the charges against him.
Sachin Waze has been at the center of legal proceedings for some time, with the Antilia case drawing national attention due to the high-profile nature of the location. The Mansukh Hiran murder case adds another layer of serious criminal liability to his profile.
The cancellation of bail is a standard legal remedy when higher courts review lower court decisions and find that the accused poses a risk or that the bail conditions were not met appropriately. No further details on the specific reasoning of the bench were provided in the initial report.