📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Ashish.prajapati90
National
Chhattisgarh HC Bars Married Daughter from Continuing Mother’s Compensation Claim
✍️ Live Law
🗓 14 Sep 2026, 12:46 PM
👁 8
The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that a married daughter cannot pursue a pending Employees’ Compensation claim filed by her mother, stating that only the claimant herself is eligible.
The Chhattisgarh High Court delivered a judgment clarifying that a married daughter is not entitled to continue a compensation claim originally filed by her mother under the Employees' Compensation Act. The court observed that the statutory provision designates the claimant – the person who suffered the injury or loss – as the sole eligible party to pursue the remedy.
In the case before the bench, the mother had initiated the claim for compensation following a workplace accident, but later sought to have her married daughter take over the proceedings. The judges dismissed the petition, emphasizing that marital status does not transfer legal standing in such claims.
The ruling underscores the principle that succession of rights under the Employees' Compensation Act is limited to the claimant or their legal heirs, and a spouse cannot substitute for the original claimant without explicit statutory provision. Legal experts note that the decision may affect similar family‑based claims across the state.
The court’s order is expected to guide lower courts and parties in future compensation disputes, reinforcing a strict interpretation of claimant eligibility under the Act.
In the case before the bench, the mother had initiated the claim for compensation following a workplace accident, but later sought to have her married daughter take over the proceedings. The judges dismissed the petition, emphasizing that marital status does not transfer legal standing in such claims.
The ruling underscores the principle that succession of rights under the Employees' Compensation Act is limited to the claimant or their legal heirs, and a spouse cannot substitute for the original claimant without explicit statutory provision. Legal experts note that the decision may affect similar family‑based claims across the state.
The court’s order is expected to guide lower courts and parties in future compensation disputes, reinforcing a strict interpretation of claimant eligibility under the Act.