📷 Image: TOI India (via NewsData)
Politics
Supreme Court Clarifies Role: Judiciary Cannot Act as Third Chamber of Parliament
✍️ TOI India
🗓 05 Nov 2026, 06:46 AM
👁 10
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that the judiciary cannot function as a third chamber of Parliament, reaffirming the distinct separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches.
The Supreme Court of India has issued a significant clarification regarding the constitutional boundaries of the judiciary. In a recent observation, the apex court stated that the judiciary cannot assume the role of a third chamber of Parliament.
This ruling reinforces the fundamental principle of the separation of powers enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The court emphasized that while the judiciary interprets laws and ensures constitutional validity, it does not possess the legislative authority to create or amend laws, a function reserved exclusively for the Parliament.
The judgment serves as a reminder to both the legislature and the judiciary of their distinct roles within the democratic framework. By rejecting the notion of the court acting as a legislative body, the Supreme Court has upheld the balance of power essential for the functioning of Indian democracy.
This legal stance is expected to guide future judicial pronouncements, ensuring that the court remains focused on adjudication and constitutional interpretation rather than policy-making or law-making.
This ruling reinforces the fundamental principle of the separation of powers enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The court emphasized that while the judiciary interprets laws and ensures constitutional validity, it does not possess the legislative authority to create or amend laws, a function reserved exclusively for the Parliament.
The judgment serves as a reminder to both the legislature and the judiciary of their distinct roles within the democratic framework. By rejecting the notion of the court acting as a legislative body, the Supreme Court has upheld the balance of power essential for the functioning of Indian democracy.
This legal stance is expected to guide future judicial pronouncements, ensuring that the court remains focused on adjudication and constitutional interpretation rather than policy-making or law-making.