📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Shiraz Husain
Crime
Rajasthan High Court Seeks Police Report in Threat Case Against Lok Sabha Speaker’s OSD
✍️ Amar Ujala · Rajasthan
🗓 07 Nov 2026, 11:15 AM
👁 12
The Rajasthan High Court has ordered the police to submit the case diary and factual report concerning the alleged threat made to Rajiv Dutta, officer on special duty to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.
The Rajasthan High Court issued a directive on Wednesday asking the state police to furnish the complete case diary and a detailed factual report on the alleged threat made to Rajiv Dutta, the Officer on Special Duty to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla.
The matter arose after Dutta reportedly received a threatening communication, prompting a police investigation that has now reached the judicial stage. The court’s order seeks to scrutinise the evidence collected so far and to ensure that the investigation adheres to procedural norms.
Legal experts note that the court’s intervention underscores the seriousness with which threats to senior parliamentary officials are treated, and it may set a precedent for faster judicial oversight in similar cases.
The police are expected to submit the requested documents within the timeframe prescribed by the bench, after which the court will decide on further procedural steps.
The development has drawn attention from political observers, who view the case as a test of the robustness of security protocols surrounding key parliamentary figures.
The matter arose after Dutta reportedly received a threatening communication, prompting a police investigation that has now reached the judicial stage. The court’s order seeks to scrutinise the evidence collected so far and to ensure that the investigation adheres to procedural norms.
Legal experts note that the court’s intervention underscores the seriousness with which threats to senior parliamentary officials are treated, and it may set a precedent for faster judicial oversight in similar cases.
The police are expected to submit the requested documents within the timeframe prescribed by the bench, after which the court will decide on further procedural steps.
The development has drawn attention from political observers, who view the case as a test of the robustness of security protocols surrounding key parliamentary figures.