📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Yann Forget
Technology
Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules Aadhaar Not Conclusive Proof of Age
✍️ NDTV Profit
🗓 11 Nov 2026, 04:07 PM
👁 17
The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that an Aadhaar card cannot be treated as definitive evidence of a person’s age, urging reliance on additional documents.
The bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court delivered a clear observation that an Aadhaar card alone cannot be considered conclusive proof of an individual's age. While the UIDAI database records a date of birth, the court noted that errors or omissions in the data are possible, making sole reliance on it risky.
In its reasoning, the court advised that age verification should be supported by other official documents such as birth certificates, school records or government-issued identity proofs. This approach aligns with existing statutory requirements that mandate multiple sources for establishing a person’s age.
The ruling is expected to impact a range of institutions—courts, employers, educational bodies and welfare schemes—that currently accept Aadhaar as the primary age document. Legal practitioners say the decision reinforces the need for a more robust verification framework and may prompt revisions to internal policies.
Experts also pointed out that the judgment echoes earlier Supreme Court observations on the limitations of Aadhaar for purposes beyond identity verification, underscoring the document’s intended scope.
In its reasoning, the court advised that age verification should be supported by other official documents such as birth certificates, school records or government-issued identity proofs. This approach aligns with existing statutory requirements that mandate multiple sources for establishing a person’s age.
The ruling is expected to impact a range of institutions—courts, employers, educational bodies and welfare schemes—that currently accept Aadhaar as the primary age document. Legal practitioners say the decision reinforces the need for a more robust verification framework and may prompt revisions to internal policies.
Experts also pointed out that the judgment echoes earlier Supreme Court observations on the limitations of Aadhaar for purposes beyond identity verification, underscoring the document’s intended scope.