🔥 TRENDING थाने के कलवा ईस्ट में त्रिनामूल कांग्र... रैमा सेन ने कोलकाता के सिटी सेंटर सॉल्... राष्ट्रीय राजकीय सत्ता परिषद या संघटने... यात्रियों की सुरक्षा को लेकर जीआरपी झा... Break ing News today three persons inj... गोलकुम्हड़ा में पटपर झांकी का भव्य आयो...
04 Nov 2026•
ગુજરાતી मराठी ਪੰਜਾਬੀ বাংলা
Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares 10% Clerks’ Promotion Quota to ADPO Posts Arbitrary
📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Gyanendra_Singh_Chau…
Jobs & Career

Madhya Pradesh High Court Declares 10% Clerks’ Promotion Quota to ADPO Posts Arbitrary

✍️ LawChakra 🗓 04 Nov 2026, 11:16 AM 👁 11
Share: 💬 WhatsApp 📘 Facebook 𝕏 Post

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has struck down the 10% promotion quota for clerks to Assistant Deputy Police Officer posts, labeling it arbitrary and unlawful.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court, sitting in Jabalpur, issued a judgment that nullifies the 10% reservation quota allowing clerical staff to be promoted to Assistant Deputy Police Officer (ADPO) positions. The bench held that the quota was introduced without a clear legal basis and violated principles of equality in service appointments.

Petitioners, representing a group of clerks, argued that the quota gave them an undue advantage over other eligible candidates and contravened existing recruitment rules. The court examined the statutory framework governing police promotions and found no provision authorising a separate 10% share for clerks.

In its order, the court directed the state government and the police department to cease any further implementation of the quota and to revert to merit‑based selection for ADPO vacancies. It also instructed the authorities to review related promotion policies to ensure compliance with constitutional guarantees.

The decision is expected to impact the career progression of thousands of clerical employees in the state police force, prompting the administration to revisit its staffing strategy. No immediate timeline for a revised promotion framework was provided.

Legal experts note that the ruling underscores the judiciary's role in scrutinising ad‑hoc reservation measures and may set a precedent for similar challenges in other states.
📲Get App