📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Muhammad Mahdi Karim/ Augustus Binu
Politics
Karnataka High Court dismisses case against BJP leaders over 'Pakistan Zindabad' chant
✍️ Livemint
🗓 06 Nov 2026, 03:33 AM
👁 14
The Karnataka High Court has set aside the criminal case against several BJP members accused of using the slogan 'Pakistan Zindabad', calling the proceedings highly unimaginable.
The Karnataka High Court has nullified a criminal case that targeted a group of BJP members for allegedly chanting "Pakistan Zindabad". The bench described the continuation of the case as "highly unimaginable" and ordered its dismissal.
The charge stemmed from accusations that the slogan violated provisions of the Indian Penal Code related to promoting enmity and disrespecting national integrity. No evidence of public disorder or incitement was presented during the proceedings.
By quashing the case, the court underscored the need for prosecutorial discretion in politically sensitive matters and signaled that mere utterance of a slogan, without demonstrable harm, does not automatically merit criminal prosecution.
Legal analysts noted that the verdict may influence how similar cases are handled in the future, especially those involving political speech and nationalistic rhetoric.
The decision has been noted by political observers as a setback for those seeking to pursue punitive action against opposition figures over controversial statements.
The charge stemmed from accusations that the slogan violated provisions of the Indian Penal Code related to promoting enmity and disrespecting national integrity. No evidence of public disorder or incitement was presented during the proceedings.
By quashing the case, the court underscored the need for prosecutorial discretion in politically sensitive matters and signaled that mere utterance of a slogan, without demonstrable harm, does not automatically merit criminal prosecution.
Legal analysts noted that the verdict may influence how similar cases are handled in the future, especially those involving political speech and nationalistic rhetoric.
The decision has been noted by political observers as a setback for those seeking to pursue punitive action against opposition figures over controversial statements.