📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Ministry of Information and Broadcasting
Politics
Former Tehelka Chief Claims Conviction Political, Plans Supreme Court Appeal
✍️ The Times of India
🗓 07 Aug 2026, 02:04 PM
👁 4
The former chief of investigative news portal Tehelka has stated that a recent conviction is politically motivated and announced plans to challenge it in the Supreme Court of India.
The former chief of the investigative news portal Tehelka has publicly declared that a recent conviction against an individual or entity is politically motivated. He said that the decision was not based on evidence but on political pressure.
The former chief has announced that he will file a petition in the Supreme Court of India to overturn the conviction. He believes that the judiciary should remain impartial and free from political interference.
No details have been released about the case or the parties involved, but the former chief’s statement has drawn attention to concerns about political influence in judicial proceedings.
Legal experts say that a Supreme Court petition can be filed if there are grounds of procedural irregularity or violation of rights. The former chief’s move may prompt a review of the case by the highest court.
The case remains under scrutiny as the former chief prepares to present his arguments before the Supreme Court.
The former chief has announced that he will file a petition in the Supreme Court of India to overturn the conviction. He believes that the judiciary should remain impartial and free from political interference.
No details have been released about the case or the parties involved, but the former chief’s statement has drawn attention to concerns about political influence in judicial proceedings.
Legal experts say that a Supreme Court petition can be filed if there are grounds of procedural irregularity or violation of rights. The former chief’s move may prompt a review of the case by the highest court.
The case remains under scrutiny as the former chief prepares to present his arguments before the Supreme Court.