📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Jeeteshroxx
Politics
CJP Legal Head Ratna Singh Voices Displeasure Over SEM Court Verdict
✍️ Amar Ujala · Delhi
🗓 19 Oct 2026, 11:15 PM
👁 21
CJP’s legal chief Ratna Singh publicly expressed dissatisfaction with the recent SEM Court ruling, calling the decision contentious.
Ratna Singh, who serves as the legal head of the CJP, reacted sharply to the latest judgment delivered by the SEM Court. In a statement released shortly after the verdict, she described the ruling as unfair and warned that it could have adverse implications for the party's legal strategy.
The SEM Court's decision, which pertains to a matter of procedural importance, has drawn criticism from several political quarters, but Singh’s comments were the most vocal. She emphasized that the judgment undermines established legal precedents and called for a review by higher judicial authorities.
Party officials have indicated that they will consider filing an appeal, while urging supporters to remain calm. The episode adds to the growing tension between the CJP and the judiciary over recent legal battles.
No further details about the specific case were disclosed, and the court has not issued a response to Singh’s remarks as of now.
The development underscores the continuing friction between political parties and the judicial system in India, highlighting the delicate balance of law and politics.
The SEM Court's decision, which pertains to a matter of procedural importance, has drawn criticism from several political quarters, but Singh’s comments were the most vocal. She emphasized that the judgment undermines established legal precedents and called for a review by higher judicial authorities.
Party officials have indicated that they will consider filing an appeal, while urging supporters to remain calm. The episode adds to the growing tension between the CJP and the judiciary over recent legal battles.
No further details about the specific case were disclosed, and the court has not issued a response to Singh’s remarks as of now.
The development underscores the continuing friction between political parties and the judicial system in India, highlighting the delicate balance of law and politics.