Chhattisgarh High Court bars Lok Adalat from adjudicating merits without settlement

The Chhattisgarh High Court has clarified the jurisdiction of Lok Adalat, stating that the alternative dispute resolution forum cannot decide cases on their substantive merits unless the disputing parties arrive at a settlement. The bench emphasized that Lok Adalat's primary function is to facilitate amicable settlements, not to substitute for regular courts in adjudicating disputes.

In its order, the court observed that any attempt by Lok Adalat to render a judgment without a mutual agreement would contravene the statutory framework governing these tribunals. The decision reiterates the principle that Lok Adalat can only pass awards that are based on the parties' consent, ensuring that its awards remain enforceable under the Legal Services Authorities Act.

Legal experts noted that the ruling provides clearer guidance to lower courts and Lok Adalat officials across the state, helping to prevent procedural lapses and protect litigants' rights. The judgment is expected to influence how Lok Adalat proceedings are conducted in Chhattisgarh, reinforcing the settlement‑centric ethos of the institution.