📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Rogfig
Politics
Bihar Bridge Naming Sparks Political Row: Rohini Acharya Questions Nitish Kumar Tribute
✍️ Amar Ujala · Patna
🗓 14 Nov 2026, 12:01 PM
👁 17
The proposal to name the new six‑lane bridge linking Darghah, Raghopur and Bidpur after former Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has ignited a heated debate in Bihar politics, with MLA Rohini Acharya demanding clarity from the current government.
The six‑lane bridge, stretching from Darghah to Raghopur and Bidpur, is set to become a critical artery for trade and travel in eastern Bihar. In a recent cabinet meeting, the state government proposed naming the structure "Niti Sh Seet" in honour of former Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, citing his role in the region’s development.
The decision has drawn sharp criticism from opposition leaders. MLA Rohini Acharya, speaking in the Bihar Legislative Assembly, questioned the appropriateness of the tribute and demanded that the government provide a detailed justification for the naming. She also raised concerns about the potential political motivations behind the move.
Nitish Kumar’s supporters argue that the bridge will serve as a lasting legacy of his tenure, while opponents fear it could be a political stunt. The debate has intensified as the government faces pressure to clarify its criteria for naming public infrastructure.
As the controversy unfolds, the state administration has yet to release a formal statement. Analysts predict that the issue will remain a focal point in upcoming elections, with parties likely to use it to rally support among voters who feel the naming decision is politically driven.
The decision has drawn sharp criticism from opposition leaders. MLA Rohini Acharya, speaking in the Bihar Legislative Assembly, questioned the appropriateness of the tribute and demanded that the government provide a detailed justification for the naming. She also raised concerns about the potential political motivations behind the move.
Nitish Kumar’s supporters argue that the bridge will serve as a lasting legacy of his tenure, while opponents fear it could be a political stunt. The debate has intensified as the government faces pressure to clarify its criteria for naming public infrastructure.
As the controversy unfolds, the state administration has yet to release a formal statement. Analysts predict that the issue will remain a focal point in upcoming elections, with parties likely to use it to rally support among voters who feel the naming decision is politically driven.