📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Rukateja
Politics
Assam MP Badruddin Ajmal Accused of Late‑Night Mosque Visits to Garner Votes
✍️ India Today NE
🗓 04 Oct 2026, 01:37 PM
👁 17
Political opponents allege that Assam MP Badruddin Ajmal has been visiting mosques at night to appeal to voters on religious grounds. The claims have sparked debate over the use of faith in electoral campaigning.
Political rivals in Assam have raised concerns that Badruddin Ajmal, a Member of Parliament and leader of the All India United Democratic Front, has been making visits to mosques during late-night hours. According to the allegations, these visits are timed to coincide with the pre‑dawn period, a time when worshippers are gathered for prayers, and are intended to sway voters by invoking religious sentiment.
The accusations were made public ahead of the upcoming state elections, with opponents claiming that Ajmal is leveraging his influence over the Muslim community to secure votes. They argue that such tactics blur the line between religious practice and political campaigning, potentially violating the secular framework of the Indian Constitution.
Ajmal has not responded to the specific claims at this stage. Election officials have been urged to monitor the situation closely to ensure that any form of vote‑bank politics does not compromise the fairness of the electoral process.
The controversy adds to a broader national conversation about the role of religion in politics, especially in states with significant minority populations. Observers note that while religious outreach is a common feature of Indian politics, the timing and nature of these alleged visits raise questions about propriety and legality.
Authorities have indicated that any proven violation of election codes could attract penalties, but no formal complaint has yet been filed. The matter remains under scrutiny as the election calendar approaches.
The accusations were made public ahead of the upcoming state elections, with opponents claiming that Ajmal is leveraging his influence over the Muslim community to secure votes. They argue that such tactics blur the line between religious practice and political campaigning, potentially violating the secular framework of the Indian Constitution.
Ajmal has not responded to the specific claims at this stage. Election officials have been urged to monitor the situation closely to ensure that any form of vote‑bank politics does not compromise the fairness of the electoral process.
The controversy adds to a broader national conversation about the role of religion in politics, especially in states with significant minority populations. Observers note that while religious outreach is a common feature of Indian politics, the timing and nature of these alleged visits raise questions about propriety and legality.
Authorities have indicated that any proven violation of election codes could attract penalties, but no formal complaint has yet been filed. The matter remains under scrutiny as the election calendar approaches.