📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Shiraz Husain
Religion
Hindu side files reply in Jaipur HC on dargah dispute, seeks district court hearing to continue
✍️ Amar Ujala · Jaipur
🗓 01 Sep 2026, 08:35 PM
👁 46
The Hindu side has lodged a written response in the Rajasthan High Court’s Jaipur bench, opposing the Muslim petition and urging that the ongoing district court proceedings continue and the case be resolved promptly.
The Hindu party has submitted a formal written reply before the Jaipur bench of the Rajasthan High Court concerning the ongoing dargah dispute. In the document, the Hindu side contests the petition filed by the Muslim party and asks the court to reject the claims made therein.
The filing specifically requests that the proceedings currently underway in the district court be allowed to continue without interruption. The Hindu representatives also emphasized the need for a swift resolution of the matter, urging the judiciary to expedite the case.
The dargah dispute has been under judicial scrutiny for some time, with both communities seeking legal redress over control and management issues. The High Court’s consideration of the Hindu side’s reply will determine the next steps in the litigation process.
Legal experts note that the High Court’s decision on whether to entertain the reply and its subsequent orders could shape the trajectory of the case, potentially influencing how similar religious property conflicts are handled in the state.
The filing specifically requests that the proceedings currently underway in the district court be allowed to continue without interruption. The Hindu representatives also emphasized the need for a swift resolution of the matter, urging the judiciary to expedite the case.
The dargah dispute has been under judicial scrutiny for some time, with both communities seeking legal redress over control and management issues. The High Court’s consideration of the Hindu side’s reply will determine the next steps in the litigation process.
Legal experts note that the High Court’s decision on whether to entertain the reply and its subsequent orders could shape the trajectory of the case, potentially influencing how similar religious property conflicts are handled in the state.